This is old news but at the March 9th Council meeting, the
council officially went on record 4-0 to politely decline Sheriff
Fitzgerald's proposal for the city to contract police services with the
county. If you read the article in last week's Alert, the gist of the
council's reasons is the feedback they received from people in their
particular wards and the fear that what looks like a deal now a few
years hence may not look so good. “If ain't broke, don't fix it”
essentially.
At that February 9th Council meeting when the sheriff made
his proposal, the local folks that spoke out were heartily in favor
of Chetek P.D. But during the ensuing weeks I also had conversations
with different business owners and citizens who encouraged me to not
be afraid to listen to what the sheriff had to say. That being said
at the present time I'm of the opinion that to contract our police
services out would be, for lack of a better phrase, “the nuclear
option.” Meaning, we have no other choice but to do so. And once we
cross the Rubicon there is no easy way back – certainly no
affordable way back: you get rid of your building, your cars, and
your equipment. If that's so, then you better be dang sure that
there are no other viable options. As far as I'm concerned, we're
not at that juncture yet. It seems there's enough public trust in our
current police force to maintain the status quo. What the future
holds is anybody's guess. Rising health care costs for our city employees
was a factor in reducing our police force by one full-time officer at
the end of 2016. Hopefully we'll secure better rates when we go
through the budget process again at the end of this year. Let's all
keep our fingers crossed.
That infamous stretch of road |
...about the possibility of
changing the speed limit on Highway SS?
Last week, Interim Chief Ron
Ambrozaitis and I attended the Traffic Safety Commission meeting at
the Justice Center. This quarterly meeting brings together Sheriff
Chris Fitzgerald, Barron County Highway Commissioner Mark Servi,
representatives from the DOT and the State Patrol, and all the police
chiefs (or their designees) from Barron County municipalities to
address traffic and safety matters throughout the county. At the
February 9th council meeting, Sheriff Fitzgerald informed
me that we had been put on the agenda to discuss the speed limit on
Highway SS north out of Chetek. I accompanied Chief Ambrozaitis to
appeal to the powers that be about:
- Increasing the speed limit on Highway SS north of Chetek to 35 mph from the current 25 mph from Heritage Credit Union to Pinewood Avenue (where it becomes 45 mph).
- Decreasing the speed limit on Highway D west to 25 mph from the current 35 mph from Railroad Avenue out to the city limits.
The conversation that followed was
educational, to say the least, and the long and short of it is I have
good news and I have bad news. First the good news.
But if we do this it's 35 mph all the way out of town |
Increasing the speed on SS north
is, surprisingly, a relatively easy fix. However,
it comes with a caveat: if we formally ask to go through with the
change the speed limit would become 35 mph from Heritage Credit Union
all the way out of town. That
is, where it becomes 45 mph around Pinewood it would be reduced to 35
mph. Why? It's
a DOT ordinance that essentially regulates speed based on 85% of the
vehicles traveling on that section of road. So, we either leave as it
is now or we increase it to 35 mph but, again, it would be 35 mph all
the way to the former Snug Harbor Resort (which are the city limits).
Interim Chief Ambrozaitis has already signed off onto it if we were
to pursue this.
Highway D driving east into town |
And
the bad news? There is no easy way to reduce the speed
limit on Highway D heading west out of town.
What's more, if we were to pay for a DOT speed study in Commissioner
Servi's carefully worded phrase, “it's a two-edged sword”: they
may determine that the speed limit should be actually increased
instead of decreased. His advice to us was, in so many words, maybe
it would be better to let sleeping dogs lie.
Why
change it at all? Well, here's my concern: after you cross through
Railroad Avenue it becomes 35 mph and between Railroad Avenue and the city
limits there are numerous households, the entryway to Faith Baptist
Church and Parker Drive. What's more, if you're coming east into
Chetek on Highway D everybody knows that a lot of vehicles are coming
in “hot” as they come down from the overpass over Highway 53. But
what if those DOT guys come, do their speed study and determine that,
gee whiz, you really should increase the limit to 45 mph? Then we
have a bigger problem. When I asked Mr. Servi just how much a speed
study costs he matter-of-factly replied, “You probably can get one
done for under 10, maybe even for under 5” (yeah, you need to add
three zeroes after both those figures.) Given that I have had zero
complaints from anybody affected on that stretch of road, I think
it's better to leave it alone and hope people practice safe driving
habits and watch out for those little kids playing in their front
yard.
Highway SS south |
And
what about the speed limit on SS south heading toward New Auburn?
Even Mr. Servi has no clue when that empty stretch between Second
Street and the Brass Rail (at which point SS becomes 50 mph) became
25 mph. For what possible reason could it be posted 25 mph when there
are no dwellings, no businesses, nothing but scenery in that half
mile stretch of county road is anybody's guess. But now the
Chetek Food Shelf is moving forward with plans to build a new
facility on land that the city donated to them on the north side of
SS. When that's completed, there will be steady traffic pulling in
and out of the Food Shelf on the days they are open for business. At
least we'll have a reason now to drive slower on that end of town.
We are on the agenda for the next
Highway Commission meeting that is tentatively set for Thursday,
April 6. At that time we will formally appeal for the change on SS
heading north. It is not a “done deal” yet, so I would appreciate any thoughts or concerns you may have prior to this meeting.
...of the fiasco with the Central
States Pension plan?
If you subscribe to The Chetek Alert, the front page article in this
week's edition is all about the difficult place the city shop guys
are in. With the exception of Director of Public Works Dan Knapp and
City Inspector Joe Atwood, the rest of the crew all belong to the
Teamsters Union whose pension plan – Central States – is going
broke.
This week's headline news |
That was a tragedy...and so will this be if things go on as they are now |
Part of it is beyond their control. According to their own numbers in
1980 there was one retiree for every four active employees; in 2016
there are now five retirees for each active employee. Also, in 1980
there were 12,000 employers compared to 1,500 employers in 2016. The
math is enough to sink this boat entire. But add to it other market
factors and – who knows? - bad fund management and it's like the
Titanic hitting the iceberg: it's just a matter of time.
As the Alert accurately reported, the City is obligated to pay
Central States a total of $48,000 year for our guys' retirement fund.
Last May we received notification from the federal government that
they plan to do nothing - i.e., there will be no bail-out like the
government did in 2008 with the auto industry. By their estimate
Central States will be out of money by 2026. However, it doesn't take
someone with special skills to read the tea leaves: it will be
insolvent way before that as older guys retire sooner than later in
hopes they can collect some of their promised pension other than none
at all. And what about our younger guys who are decades away from
retirement? As it stands now they will be out. Squat. Nadda. But in
the meantime we must keep sending in our check or pay them about $1.2
million to “get out” of the plan. We crunched some numbers and
assuming 3.5% interest, we could secure some kind of loan and then be
paying that back for the next 25 years. That's a cold bowl of
soup to swallow!
The letter we received last May |
So, what's the plan? Well, we're working on it and we have good
reasons to do so. First, we want to do what we can for Tim, Mike and
Joe who in the not-so-distant future will be turning in their yellow
vests. Second, we also want to take care of Rod, "Tank" and Aaron who
are going be with us, we presume, for some time. Thirdly, how does
Dan adequately recruit qualified people to fill the positions soon to
be vacated by Tim, Mike and Joe when he can't promise them that their
position will come with retirement benefits? It puts him behind the
8-ball to say the least.
We're grateful for this crew (missing: Tim Berning) |
I don't have a lot of answers I can share with you yet. And even our
best solution won't be a slam-dunk. At most, it'll be some shots in
the paint that may be heavily defended by the union. But we feel we
have to try for the sake of the guys we have now and the guys – or
gals – we hope to hire in the future. As soon as I can I'll let you
know what we come up with.