Thursday, July 26, 2018

A Glorious Mess: the Stout Street Public Dock

The path that heads to the lake at the corner of Stout & First Streets

A rain garden is a garden that is built to absorb rainfall and storm water runoff.  It is designed to look like an attractive garden and support the local habitat.  Plants with deep fibrous roots tend to work best because they can better clean and filter the water.  The gardens are located between a spot of high runoff and a protected area.  As the rainwater enters the garden it is cleaned, filtered and slowed to prevent erosion as well as any contaminants from proceeding through.  These gardens become even more important as development continues and eliminates lands natural ability to absorb water.  They are easy to create on your own land or area that you maintain near the Chetek Chain of Lakes.” from the Chetek Lakes Protection Association's website



A few weeks ago at the July city council meeting the Stout Street public dock was on the agenda due to some concern raised by a few neighbors of its overgrown appearance. You've heard of the saying, “It's a jungle out there”? Well, according to Dave and Kathy Ziarnik (who live right next door to the public dock) “the jungle”, as they refer to it, is right across the yard. To add insult to injury on occasion when boaters hook up to the dock, they pee in the bushes in plain sight (and, according to them, we're not just talking about the guys). They wondered if the city might do something about this matter and clean up this “mess”.

Looking from the dock

If you have lived in Chetek for awhile you can recall when the only thing above the dock was a section of grass kept regularly mowed by the city. But then in 2013 the students and staff of what was then the Red Cedar Environmental Institute (now defunct) adopted that site and in cooperation with the city and the DNR created a rain garden. A rain garden is (to quote Google): “a garden of native shrubs, perennials, and flowers planted in a small depression, which is generally formed on a natural slope. It is designed to temporarily hold and soak in rain water runoff that flows from roofs, driveways, patios or lawns.” In the fall of 2013 they laid down permeable pavers and planted 1,500 native plants to help slow down rainwater that heads right to the lake as well as prevent foot traffic from eroding the ground. Five years later, the flowers have taken root, the dogwoods are blooming and yes, some weeds and other volunteers have sprung up but for all intents and purposes our rain garden is flourishing.


A week after the City Council meeting, members of the Parks Committee as well as Public Works Director Dan Knapp and City Inspector Joe Atwood sat down with Dave Blumer from LEAPS (Lake Education And Planning Services) for his assessment of the “mess” at the corner of Stout and First Street. Dave put together a very informative slide presentation about the general health of the Chain, how storm water runoff affects its health and the things we can do to prevent or slow the effects that runoff has on our waters.

What goes in...


...eventually pours out

The major take-away for me from Dave's talk is perhaps the biggest “duh”-statement that you've read recently: when it rains, it pours. What I mean by that is when it rains whatever makes it to the storm drains – cigarette butts, plastic bottles, doggy doo-doo, you name it – pours into the lake. Add that to the mix of leaves and grass clippings that naturally find their way to storm drains and you've essentially got yourself a recipe for algae growth – the very thing we're trying to slow in our perennial green lake system.



Beautiful lake shore home but no lake buffer
My father-in-law, now deceased, lived in the southern part of the state on a similar man-made body of water like Lake Chetek with a river running through it. He was one of those guys who would cut his grass right to the water's edge. Later he added riprap (basically loose stone to armor shorelines against erosion) but to his dying day he could not countenance anything beyond grass at the shore and that had to be no longer than 2.5 inches high. But as the folks at the Chetek Lakes Protection Association (CLPA) have been advocating for years, that may look neat and orderly but it only contributes to the problem of how green our lakes are. Thus the push for lakeowners and
municipalities with lake access to create rain gardens and lake buffers. In fact, the CLPA website (http://www.cheteklakespa.org) has a very informative section on Healthy Lakes Projects that provides links to DNR publications to educate you further on how simple things like this can slow and filter the water that heads to the lakes.

According to Dave, it is his professional assessment that our rain garden is doing what it was designed to do: slow and filter runoff. The following morning, some of us from that same committee met at the boat dock with Amanda Kostner, a representative from the DNR, who after going through “the jungle” concurred with Dave's opinion: it's a wonderful rain garden that is helping filter the runoff that comes from the storm drain at the top of the hill. She pointed out to us some box elders and maples that had sprung up that could be removed but otherwise her counsel to us was to leave it alone.

Porta potty now available for your...inconvenience
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, I suppose. What some would call a mess or a jungle, others call a little patch of nature that is quite lovely to look at especially with the flowers in bloom. The council did approve putting a porta potty at the end of the dock and hopefully that will deter boaters and fishermen from alleviating themselves in plain sight. I think some signage as to what the purpose of this small section of growth is would be helpful too.

Maintaining and improving the health of the Chain should be a shared concern for all of us who live around here – not just for those who live on the lake or benefit from people who come to play here. I'm told that politicians and governmental bureaucrats in Madison want to point to that pipe that enters the Chetek River from the Waste Water Treatment Plant and tax and regulate that in order to “fix” what's wrong with Tainter Lake and Lake Menomin. But in my opinion there is no magic bullet that will enhance and improve the overall health of the Chain of Lakes. Rather, it will be the cumulative affect of little things like rain gardens, lake buffers, the work of the ecoharvester (aka, “the skimmer”) and other ventures that overtime will contribute to a healthier lake system. And our little “jungle” at the corner of First and Stout is part of the solution not part of the problem.

Cool machine but only one piece of a larger puzzle






Monday, July 2, 2018

Some thoughts on the things that go boom: Fireworks on the Fourth


I see fireworks! I see the pageant and
Pomp and parade
I hear the bells ringing out
I hear the cannons roar
I see Americans - all Americans
Free forever more”
Is Anybody There?
1776





So much fun to light off
and so illegal
We're just a day away from Independence Day and though this year's celebration falls in the middle of the week, it's sure to draw crowds to town for the annual Liberty Fest parade and the fireworks finale over the lake at nightfall. Those will be the official fireworks that are permitted, sponsored and entirely legal. Everything else lit off, blown up or shot off, be it your bottle rocket, M-80, cherry bomb, or run-of-the-mill firecracker is...well...illegal (see Article III in the Municipal Code which covers everything you want to know about fireworks).


All in good fun
Of course, we all light up or shoot off something on that night be it sparklers, smoke bombs or fountains (which quickly shoot off an array of colorful sparks). It is the 4th after all. I'm pretty sure that if you're supervising your children as they light up some spinners or sparklers you won't have any worry of Chetek PD pulling up at your house to issue you a citation. (Having said that, this past winter while making a presentation to a third grade class at Roselawn I was asked by a student if it was illegal to shoot off fireworks inside the city limits. I told her that while it is not permitted a lot of people do anyway with no interference by the police. At which point she informed me that last summer her parents were cited for doing just that thing. My guess it was either because it was a pretty big display or it happened in the middle of the night.)

Last week I received this note via Messenger at my Mayor's Facebook page:

Will there be a post about fireworks and the limitations within City Limits? And at what time they need to be done with them? Last year it was 1 in the morning and they were still lighting them off in the city limits. Frustrated about Fireworks in Chetek



When I was a kid growing up in Milwaukee every night at 10 p.m. a public service announcement would intone: “Parents, it's 10 p.m. Do you know where your children are?” That was curfew. If you were outside after 10 p.m. - with or without your parents' knowledge – chances are you were up to no good. While that message is no longer broadcasted on TV, in Chetek quiet hours begin at 10 p.m. So whether you got a late start cutting your lawn or you're having a karaoke night in your backyard, at 10 bells the mowing has to cease and the party's over. The same goes for fireworks. Realistically, by the time the Liberty Fest fireworks are over and you make your way home there's really no time left for shooting up your own display (even though by ordinance that is illegal within the city limits).


Frustrated about Fireworks, my guess is that the people who engage in this kind of obnoxious behavior are not likely to read mayor's blogs urging them to act responsibly. They're the same type who probably feel compelled to stack beer cans underneath the long bridge as they pass under it. But just in case by some wild happenstance they happen to come along this post, let me say it as simply as I can: please be considerate of your neighbors. You may have the rest of the week off but they may have an early start the following morning. They may have little kids they're trying to get to bed or a dog that has astraphobia (the fear of thunder or very loud noises). Fun is fun but don't abuse the privilege (and yes, if you're still lighting them off at 1 in the morning no one is amused any longer). Here's hoping you have a wonderful 4th celebrating with measured frivolity. Like the old saying goes, it's all fun and games until the cops show up. Don't give them cause to show up at your house.

Celebrate responsibily






Tuesday, June 26, 2018

Funny you should ask: what are the rules about fencing around pools?


WHY ARE ALL THESE SWIMMING POOLS POPPING UP ALL OVER TOWN WITHOUT PROPER FENCING AROUND THEM??!"
- Peeved About Pools in Chetek

That's what I was recently asked by an irate resident who called to ask me why they had to put a fence around their pool while others seem to get away without having one around theirs? Well, as I do with all questions I'm asked I usually go right to the source to get the low down. That usually means one of the following people: City Clerk Carmen Newman, Public Works Director Dan Knapp, Police Chief Ron Ambrozaitis or City Inspector Joe Atwood. If they don't know the answer (and one of them probably does) then there's no help for it. It has to be a theological conundrum of some sort or another. So after I concluded that conversation I spoke with Joe Atwood who was only too happy to inform me everything I need to know about swimming pools.

Just in case you were wondering, no fence needed here


Namely – and most importantly – if it's two feet deep or less then it does not need a protective fence around it. That means your basic “kiddie pool” that you can buy at Wal-Mart for $15-30 is fine without fencing. (This caller reminded me that you could drown in a bathtub just as well as in a kiddie pool. They're right of course. Our ordinances, however, don't cover such a scenario). When I 
The guy knows his stuff
asked Joe about the alleged “pool plague” presently afflicting Chetek, he informed me that most of the pools he has seen around town meet the two feet deep or less standard.

However, if the pool is deeper than two feet, it's just entered a whole new category of pool. A few weeks ago, Deputy City Clerk and Treasurer Cassandra Larson posted a very helpful graphic at the City of Chetek Facebook page, the information which I'll re-post here. Citing Section 118-257(f) (1):

All outdoor swimming pools having a depth capacity of two feet or more shall be completely enclosed by a fence prior to use of the swimming pool...Such fence shall be not less than four feet in height above the ground level immediately below. Such fence shall be of not less than 11.5 gauge chain link fencing or such other construction which will make access to the swimming pool area equally difficult.”

This family (not from Chetek) clearly knows the rules about fencing

When I asked Joe about the need for chain link fencing he said that he focuses on the phrase “...or such other construction which will make access to the swimming pool area equally difficult.” Personally, Joe disapproves of chain link fencing as its pretty easy for kids to climb over. The main thing is Joe has to see it and approve of the fencing before it goes up.

Such fence or wall shall be constructed in such a design to resist climbing and as not to have voids, holes, or openings larger than four inches in one dimension. Any open space in the plane of the fence shall be equipped with a gate. Each gate shall have at least the minimum height required for the fence and shall be equipped with self-closing and self-latching devices placed at the top of the gate or at a place which is otherwise inaccessible to small children.”


My wife, Linda, has been wanting to put a pool up in our backyard for many summers running. It's that fence-requirement-thing that kills it for me. To buy any kind of fencing “in such a design to resist climbing” and one that has a gate in it prices me right out of that idea.

Last week, Joe actually had to stop at a residence that had a pool in their backyard and inform the owners that they, in fact, had to drain their pool by the next day as it was deep enough to require a fence around it which they didn't have. They were good sports about it and drained their pool as he requested but they're disappointed all the same. After all, if you spend several hundred dollars on a pool you hate to see your investment just laying on the ground.

Section 118-257(f)(3) does allow a temporary fix, however:

Prior to the initial filling with water, each such outdoor swimming pool shall be enclosed by either fencing as required in this section, or a temporary construction fence. Such temporary fence shall be a snow fence, or a fence of similar design, at least four feet in height and securely anchored in place. The fence shall be constructed with its base flush to the ground and shall have supportive posts placed no more than eight feet apart. The fence shall remain in place until such time as a permanent fence is installed as provided in this section. The installation of a permanent fence shall take place no later than 60 days after the initial filling of the swimming pool.”

If you're prone to look for loop-holes, I guess here's one for you.
This will do for two months
You can put snow fencing around your pool so long as that within 60 days you have a more permanent fence erected around it. If you bought one this weekend, two months from now it'll probably be too cold to go swimming (and if you haven't cleaned it out since you filled it up the first time it will definitely be too gross to do so). But if I were you, I'd call Joe
first before you invest any money in a pool or fencing materials. He's only too happy to talk you through what you need to know. You can reach him at 715-764-2948.

Like all municipal ordinances, these rules aren't personal. We're not picking on anyone. In this case, the heart of the matter is safety. Nobody wants to be that person who because they neglected to secure their pool a little child tragically drowned. So, do the right thing. If the lake is too green for your liking, then head to Barron's or Rice Lake's pool. Or, if you want your own pool just make sure you reference Section 118 of our Municipal Code and let Joe know what you're thinking.



Thursday, June 21, 2018

Cats, dogs and the Golden Rule


"A dog doesn't care if you're rich or poor, educated or illiterate, clever or dull. Give him your heart and he will give you his."
Marley & Me

"No family or person shall own, harbor or keep in its possession more than two dogs or cats on any residentially zoned lot without the prior approval of the Common Council, which may be conditional, except that a litter of pups or kittens or a portion of a litter may be kept for not more than eight weeks from birth. If more than one family resides on a residential lot, then only a total of four dogs or cats shall be allowed on the residential lot unless prior approval is obtained from the Common Council."
Section 18-32 (c) of the City of Chetek Code of Ordinances



He was a great dog
Pets. They make our lives richer and fuller by having them. In our nearly twenty-seven years in Chetek we've been blessed with a number of them – a couple of dogs, a couple of cats, some goldfish, a guinea pig and a rabbit to boot. Our first dog, Buster, though he was a runner by inclination and we frequently were bailing him out of the pokey, was amazing. It broke our hearts the day he died. Jack, our other dog, well...not so much but that's another story.

More often than not lately, pets have been an agenda item at the city council meeting in the form of a pet waiver. Like so many other things in our lives as members of this community, even the number of pets we own is governed by the Code.

The physical Code of Ordinances is pretty thick. The on-line version is far more user-friendly

How many?
Two. That's what we're allowed. Not two cats and two dogs but a cat and a dog or two dogs and no cats or two cats and no dogs. However you do the math at the end of the day if you have more than two critters you are not legal.


Why only two?
Well, I think you can figure it out. Some of us are just bleeding hearts for our canine and feline friends and when no limits are enforced, we collect them out of compassion for their welfare. But what about your neighbors? People bristle at that question because frequently their first response to that question is that their neighbors “should mind their own beeswax”. But according to our Code,  

The keeping of a large number of dogs or cats within the City for a considerable period of time detracts from and, in many instances, is detrimental to, healthful and comfortable life in such areas. The keeping of a large number of dogs or cats is, therefore, declared a public nuisance. Sec 18-32(a)

The truth is we may live in a rural area but if you live in town you don't live in the country. We just live too close to each other to allow small packs of dogs or prides of cats to proliferate next door. So years ago the limit was set at two.

Waiver needed:
As someone who has run for public office twice now, I can verify this for certain: many individuals in our city do not comply with the two pet rule. I know. I've met several of their canine members of their households at more than a few homes as I have gone door to door. Now it could be that some of these individuals have waivers on file at city hall which allows them to have more than two pets at their home. My hunch is, however, that a lot of folk just don't bother to go through the relatively painless process of securing a waiver which would allow them to legally have more than two pets at their address.


It works like this. A certain household member who already has two pets suddenly has to take in two more as her son, who serves in the military, just was deployed overseas for the next year and has no where for his dogs to go. She fills out the waiver explaining what kind of dogs they are and how long she plans on holding them. It then goes before the council for approval. In every case thus far that I've been serving as mayor the council has never denied a reasonable request. They frequently set limits to the waiver (e.g., the mother may keep her sons' dogs until the son returns from his deployment overseas) but they usually accommodate the pet owner's request. The fee per waiver is $25.

License required.

If your pooch is five months old or older, he needs to have a license (per Sec 18-93(a)). That's not our rule. That's the State's. At the present time there are no licenses required for cats (but you still can only have two). As part of licensing you need to show proof that your dog has been immunized against rabies (18-93(d)). Licenses are good for a year. $6/if your dog is spayed or neutered. $12 if they're not fixed. Again, those fees are set by the State with which the city fully complies with.

But what about dogs running loose?
Well, of course, they're not supposed to be (18-25) but as an owner of a former “runner”, sometimes they break their leash while tied up in the back yard or pull out of their collar and go out on a lark. We don't have a city dog catcher so who do you call if a dog comes sniffing into your yard? As much as City Clerk-Treasurer Carmen Newman loves dogs, don't call her. Call the police. Through email, I asked Chief Ambrozaitis about this very thing and this is what he wrote back:

We handle all dog complaints on a call by call basis. We have a policy concerning dangerous dogs, and [we handle this] when receiving a call on them. As far as dogs at large we handle them the best way we can. We try to find the owners via social media, word of mouth, etc... If this does not work and if a county deputy is available they will transport to Happy Tails in Barronett. We no longer take them to Barron as the Humane Society does not have a contract with the county anymore. Handling animals in the city has become some what of a problem but so far we have been able to handle them without any issues.”

(Note: Chetek PD will not take any dogs to Happy Tails Pet Boarding & Daycare as Barronett is 38 miles away and that would mean the only officer on duty would be gone a couple of hours making sure Fido is taken care of. It's not a very good use of police resources.) I recently spoke with Officer Jessica Larson about this and she told me that when she gets a loose dog call she tries to coax the wandering pup into the back of her squad and take it to the shop. Then via Facebook the word gets out and soon after the owner usually stops by the PD to pick up their lost dog  - usually.

And what about other animals?
Well, in case you were wondering, if you live within the city limits you can't own a polar bear or an alligator let alone any other federally protected animals (18-213a). You can own a snake so long as its not poisonous but otherwise all dangerous critters such as cheetahs, elephants or hippos are verboten (18-213e) (see the extended list in the Code, if only for your own amusement). You can own bees (which, strictly speaking, are not animals) but if you do and you do not live in a neighborhood that is zoned agricultural you're going to need to obtain a conditional use permit which often includes a public hearing so your neighbors can weigh in on the matter (see 18-263 thru 18-265). And let me state for the record that you can't shoot those pesky squirrels that get into your bird feeder. They may deserve it but the Code deems that cruel and unusual punishment (see 18-184). Sorry, dear wife, but you can't do it.

For the time being
You can own rabbits but you can't raise them to sell them (18-214). And at the present time the City does not allow anyone to own chickens (although every year we are approached by individuals who query if the council will ever reconsider that position). Otherwise all other farm animals – pigs, cows, horses, goats - are not permitted within the city limits (see 118-84c). Again, if you want country air then maybe looking for property in the surrounding townships is your best option.

There are reasons that all these rules are on the books. Not only are they similar (or identical) to other communities like ours but they also generally govern our civil interaction with each other. If we lived in a more perfect world, “love thy neighbor” and “the golden rule” would suffice, regardless of your individual religious persuasion. But we don't. So in the interim we live by the laws set by the State and the Municipal Code. It helps keep our town from truly going to the dogs.






Friday, May 25, 2018

Funny you should ask: what's the big deal about that new house being built by the airport?


Sec. 118-89. - Airport heights limitation zone.
Airport hazard means any structure or object of natural growth, which obstructs the air space required for the flight of aircraft in landing or taking off at an airport or is otherwise hazardous to such landing or taking off.

(c) Height limitation zones.
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, no structure shall be constructed, installed, altered, located or permitted to remain after such construction, installation, alteration or location to a height in excess of the height limit indicated on the map referred to in Subsection (b) of this section.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in this section, no trees shall be allowed to grow to a height in excess of the height limit indicated on the map referred to in Subsection (b) of this section.
(3) Except as otherwise provided in this section, no drones shall be operated at or above a height in excess of the height limit indicated on the map referred to in Subsection (b) of this section.

(d)Exceptions. 
The restrictions contained in Subsection (b) of this section shall not apply to objects which are less than 35 feet in height above ground level at the object site within one-half-mile of the airport boundary or to structures less than 50 feet in height above ground within the area beginning one-half mile from the airport boundary and extending to one mile from the airport boundary or to structures less than 100 feet in height above the ground within the area beginning one mile from the airport boundary and extending to three miles from the airport boundary.

An old Google map of our grass runway as it pictures only one house on Nielsen Lane

If you subscribe to the Chetek Alert you know that last month we had a bit of a dust-up during the City Council meeting over a new house being built on Nielsen Lane near the grassy runway. A small contingent of local pilots appointed commercial pilot Al Knowlton to speak on their behalf alerting the city what a safety hazard that house presents.

Here's the issue: a house rises near the end of the grass runway
Since statistics show most fatal crashes occur during takeoff, the homes at the end of the runway could be deadly obstacles. They should not have been built in the first place. We don't build houses within 50 feet of a freeway for those reasons. Cars go fast.” (Al Knowlton as quoted in the Chetek Alert 5/16/18)

Greg Brodt, another local pilot who has similar safety concerns about the construction of this house, privately messaged me the following questions:

Did the city issue a building permit [for the dwelling] off the west end of the runaway?

If so, this could be very dangerous. Did the airport commission approve it or make any recommendations? Were there any concerns that the State had?

Let me answer those questions. First of all, Yes. The city did issue a building permit for this house.

Every house that is built within the city limits has to be okayed by Joe Atwood the City Inspector before it's built. This house is no different. The inferred concern about the height of the house does not apply. According to Section 118-89 anything under 35 feet tall within one-half mile of the airport is legit. I think the peak of the house being built is slightly under 25-feet tall. That's where our jurisdiction ends. If it's under 35 feet (and clearly it is) than we cannot tell someone not to build in that spot.

As to the question regarding the airport commission approving or not approving the construction of the house (which the city cannot refuse a permit to the owner anyway), technically speaking there is no airport commission any longer. Last year after several meetings in a row not able to meet for lack of quorum it was the recommendation to the council that we disband the commission which we voted unanimously to do. From that moment on the city council essentially became the airport commission and Public Works Director Dan Knapp airport manager. As to the concerns specific to this house none were raised before they dug the hole as the airport manager had none to make.

I'd hate to see someone crash into it or them to complain about noise” (Greg Brodt). As would I. As would all of us. I certainly understand the pilots are motivated by concerns for public safety but again there is nothing the city can do to restrict this home owner from building their home on Nielsen Lane. I also agree with Greg about noise issues: If you build your house next to an airport than you forfeit your right to complain about the noise airplanes make. Agreed. There's plenty of people on South Street and Phillips Street who have come accustomed to the sound of planes coming in and taking off. The folks on Nielsen Lane are no different.

This is what nobody wants ever to see at Southworth Airport
In my brief tenure as mayor council meetings can get kinda sporty at times as people for and against an issue sound off before the council and at times at each other. Obviously it's because they care about the matter at hand. Our job as the council is to listen respectfully and make the best call we can based on the current ordinances that govern our daily lives. In this case, our airport manager informs us that while in the event of a catastrophic event a plane could crash into a house there is no code that limits the construction of this home. Let's hope we never have cause to regret that the city never purchased the navigation rights to these properties back in 2003 when this subdivision was created.

Tuesday, May 22, 2018

Gambling with the tax-payers' money?


You got to know when 
to hold 'em,
Know when to fold 'em,
Know when to walk away,
And know when to run.
You never count your money
When you're sittin' at the table.
There'll be time enough for countin'
When the dealing's done.”
- The Gambler by Kenny Rogers

If you haven't heard (and my guess is you probably have) there's a whole lot of municipal dollars that have been exchanging hands lately - or about to exchange - and if you're like me you may be just a mite curious as to where all this money is coming from.

Central States
You see the fine print?
That's what a bill for $2Mil looks like
For starters, the settlement with Central States. On Good Friday, Carmen and I affixed our signatures to a 10-year note for $770K (and some change) to officially exit the Central States Pension Fund, the pension for those members of our public works crew who belong to the Teamsters. The original bill for our fair share of the liability was plus $2 million dollars but through an accepted industry formula our attorney negotiated this amount down to $770K. The 10-year note amortized over 20 years comes to about what we were originally paying each month to Central States (approximately $4,500). In July 2017, when we ceased sending pension funds to the union, we began funding our public works crews' personal retirement fund (otherwise known as a 457 plan) at the same amount we had been sending to the Teamsters. In other words, we'll be double-dipping for some time to come - paying on this note, continuing to contribute to the guys' pensions. This money comes out of the general fund.

And just like that we committed ourselves to $770K


More new sidewalks coming soon
Then there's the new sidewalks. A few weeks ago the City Council approved $50K worth of new sidewalks this summer. This includes among other sections:

Stout Street: from Second Street to the Chetek Area Alano Club (next to City Hall)




  • Moore Street: from the Police Station to Second Street
  • Knapp Street: Corner of Knapp and Second Street by Time and Again
  • Knapp Street: the section of walk in front of Jason Fostvedt's new building (the former Chetek Beauty Salon)
  • Knapp Street: Corner of Knapp and Third Street by the former Cabin Fever
  • Knapp Street: Corner of Third and Knapp at Synergy Co-op (formerly Lakeland Co-op) side of the street
  • Knapp Street: from the old Car Quest building to the railroad tracks
  • Main Street Park: the section in front of Main Street Park on Second Street


Last year when our sidewalk replacement campaign began in earnest the decision was made that no business would be assessed for the expense since its to everyone's benefit to have safe and aesthetically pleasing walkways in the Central Business District. So if no one is being assessed for the expense of tearing up and replacing the new walks where is the money coming from? Well, we have tapped into a source to fund this project – it's one of our capital improvement funds.

If there is one thing I've learned since being elected mayor is that there are funds always being set-aside for later purchases. When Dan goes to buy a new truck (i.e., a new-to-us truck) money has been set aside for that very thing already. Same goes with any new piece of equipment we may need or require. You can call it a “rainy day” fund if you like but we just can't call it that (according to the rules set by the State). The main thing to know is nobody was taxed for the sidewalks. We just took the money from this account to pay for these new sidewalks.


New owners of the Chetek Cafe building
And then there's the talk of the town – the two-way deal of Chetek Cafe purchasing Bob's Grill and the city purchasing the old cafe. Why would the city get involved in a deal like this? Simple: we're interested in Norbert's property (i.e., Chetek Cafe). Actually, its a win-win-win situation: Dwayne “Frog” Trowbridge has been wanting to get out of Bob's Grill for some time, Norbert & Patty have been wanting to expand and we see potential in their piece of real estate. What is the city going to do with a cafe? Well, we're not opening up a hot dog stand that's for sure. I prefer to look at it this way: we have a Police Department in an old post office and a library in an old wood shop. If....(and that is a BIG if) the Chetek Area Alano Club (who is housed in the old fire hall right next to the current city hall) we're willing to sell their property back to the city then we would end up with half of the block. If all that were to come together (and the stars were to align) we would retain the services of people who do community development to help us envision what we might be able to do with that half block. Perhaps a future multi-purpose governmental facility which would house both Police Department, City Hall and Library – or some other combination? If you've wondered aloud, 'What are they thinking?' well, that's what we're thinking.

Part of the deal is that this iconic sign will go to the museum

Norbert will refurbish and take this sign with him to his new digs

Are we shooting too high? Well you know what Emerson said, “Hitch your wagon to a star.” Worst case scenario and the Alano Club chooses to hold on to their building and our best laid plans run awry we still end up with a prime piece of real estate on Second Street that we can market to a future business. If you're a person like myself whose income doesn't really change from year to year, it seems like a big risk and a lot of zeros. But in municipal spending terms, $170K is a pretty good price and an acceptable risk to take on. This too would be paid out of that aforementioned capital improvement fund at no additional expense to the tax payers.

The light may be turning off at Bob's but Spudniks will remain - that, too, is part of the deal

There's more to tell you about but this is just the stuff that I can talk about at the present time. After all, it would not be good form to talk particulars about matters that the council hasn't even been fully apprised about yet. Am I sounding like some high roller who's flush and in a hurry to get over to the St Croix Casino on the other side of the county? Other than the payout to Central States (which was a necessity) I guess these expenditures are a bit of a gamble - but it's a good bet, an investment in the future of our city that we're hoping reaps rich dividends for all of us.