Not us but it had the same feel as us last Thursday except more cops |
Last Thursday night we literally had
standing room only in the council chambers at City Hall for the
February council meeting. The lion's share of the folks there were
gathered to hear Sheriff Chris Fitzgerald present his proposal of the
city contracting police services with the county. The room was so
full of cops – county deputies, detectives, department heads and
many of our own police officers – that the running joke of the
first half of the meeting was that if anybody needed to get somewhere
in a hurry, Highway SS heading north out of town was clear.
In about twenty minutes or so, Sheriff
Fitzgerald gave a 25-slide power point presentation pitching why it
would be advantageous for the city to contract with the county and
disassemble our own police department – streamlining of services,
access to all additional units the county offers like the Emergency
Response Team and K-9 teams, better communication, and the savings to
tax payers. I won't speak for everyone in the room but I think most
of us were eager for him to get to Slide 17 that broke down what that
savings would be. By his estimate, if the city were to adopt his
proposal and sign a five-year contract we would realize an
approximate $50,000 a year savings. What's more, there would be
additional money saved as we would no longer have any squad cars to
maintain because we wouldn't own any squad cars any more. We wouldn't
need to heat or light a building or a municipal court because that
would be gone, too, as would all the gizmos and gadgets any local
police department needs to function effectively.
designated officers who would be assigned to us. That is, these four would be “permanently” posted here – not deputies who would serve a weekly rotation in town and then return to patrolling elsewhere in the county. So, in time, we would come to know Deputies “Tom, Dick, Harry and Sue” as well as we know Ron, Jessica, Jon and Rick now. He also assured the council that someone representing his department would be present at our monthly council meetings and any other committee meeting we would request. The long and short of it is we would get what we already have except it would cost less and, in his opinion, be a better service.
While the meeting was not a public
hearing I had promised beforehand that if we all gave the sheriff an
opportunity to present his plan, I would allow questions from the
floor – something Sheriff Fitzgerald was eager to respond to. For
the next thirty minutes or so he was like a batter at
batting practice hitting all kinds of questions pitched at him –
heaters, changeups, breaking balls and the like. Overall, what I
heard were legitimate concerns about things like response time, the
bottom line (i.e., do the numbers say what they really say?),
familiarity with Chetek and access to police. As Bruce from
Northlakes Drive In so aptly put it, “If I need Ron or Jessica or
John or Rick, I take out my phone and call them. Could I call your
guys?”
On the main, people were pretty well
behaved though it would be fair to characterize the atmosphere as
tense. Change is hard on everyone. But talking about change as well
as thinking about talking about change can be equally stressful. The
council simply invited the sheriff to hear what he had to say.
As elected officials we have an obligation to the public to make sure
we are providing the best services we are able to while getting the
most bang for our buck at the same time. It may be a surprise to some
people but from time to time Carmen will crunch numbers to explore,
say, contracting our garbage services out as Rice Lake does. It's not
because she hears complaints about our guys. Far from it (I have it
on good authority that at Christmastime those guys make a haul in
cookies and spirits from people who are grateful for their service).
It's just making sure we are doing things in a cost-effective way. So
having the sheriff come and talk to us was just exploring our
options.
Of course, what people really want to
know is now that we know the numbers what are we going to do about
it? Are we going to go forward with his proposal? Are we going to
think on it? Are we going to File 13-it? Well, it's hard to answer
that question. The sheriff's proposal was but one item on an already
full agenda and other than the questions the council members and
others present asked the sheriff there really was no discussion
that followed his presentation. I haven't seen any of the members of
the council since Thursday night and technically we can't really
discuss it among ourselves without a 24-hour notice in the paper.
As of right now, I've asked Carmen to put it on the agenda for next
month's council meeting where we will either conclude that we need
think on his proposal further or essentially tell him “thanks, but
no thanks.” For the time being everything remains status quo.
Along with his proposal the sheriff
presented a possible timeline if
the council felt it was in the
city's best interest to pursue his plan. That timeline assumed
adopting the plan in March and implementing it in time for Liberty
Fest. But let me remind everyone who was there or may have heard from
those who were there, it was his timeline not ours. Nothing is
imminent.
I appreciate those of you who have
taken the time to either stop me on the street to express your
opinion about the matter or wrote as much on the mayor's Facebook
page or sent me an email. Whether you're “for it” or “against
it”, your input is valuable in all the things we address as elected
leaders in our community. Call your alderman, either Cliff, Bill,
Mark or Shirley. Each of them have been serving our city way longer
than I have and welcome your input.
There have been a few individuals –
but just a few - who have expressed themselves very frankly at the
mayor's page on this matter going so far to question my intelligence
and competency because I am not (in their opinion) pro-CPD. I'm sorry
that they feel that way but when I read their words again I'm
reminded that we still live in a free country where people are free
to speak their mind and not fear repercussion or retaliation. And
that's a very good thing.
Excellent article Mayor Martin. Like you, I will need a lot more public input, I need to get their opinions and base making such a monumental decision on their input. I have served the residents of the 3rd Ward as their council rep. since 2005 It's a privilege I don't take lightly. It's my duty as their elected representative to support their opinions. Bill Waite, 3rd Ward Council Rep.
ReplyDelete