|
Last week's Alert |
If
you're a regular subscriber to The
Chetek Alert you're
aware that there seems to be a dust-up of sorts lately between the
Chetek Ambulance Commission (CAC) and some of their personnel as well
as with the city itself. In last week's Alert there was a letter from
the CAC and a large three-column ad taken out by the group calling
themselves the “Concerned Citizens of Chetek”, made up of an
anonymous group of “members of the ambulance service”, seeking to
address “negative attention” of late from (among others) “the
city of Chetek”.
|
There was way more to this ad |
On
the main, the bulk of the ad seeks to clarify things that one of
their employees and members of his family said at a recent city
council meeting. Given that the city does not run the ambulance
service I am not going to comment on internal matters nor pick a side
in that dispute. That is a personnel issue that the CAC is
responsible for resolving and it's not our place to meddle. But given
we are a paying customer at the table – a customer, by the way, who
in the last few years has seen significant increases to our annual
subsidy – I think it's fair for us to have a better understanding
how that dollar figure is arrived at.
Honestly,
up until last November, most of what I knew about the CAC I learned
through 4th
Ward Alderman Mark Edwards, our representative on the commission. But
on the morning of November 7 after receiving a call from an upset
owner of one of our local restaurants who wanted to know why one of
their customers was laying on the floor for 45 minutes awaiting an
ambulance, I've tried to learn a few things more. Granted what
happened on that morning was something of a perfect storm but we were
out of service that morning and I wanted to know why. Since then I've
attended a few CAC meetings in seeking a better understanding of just
how it works.
With
regards to the EMTs who man the rig and come running when we are in
need, it cannot be said enough how grateful we are for your service.
This isn't your primary job and we appreciate the sacrifices you make
to provide emergency services to our citizens. If we have a bone to
pick, it certainly isn't with any of you. But given that subsidies
have increased significantly over the last few years it is not for
nothing that without coordination every single council member and
myself were in attendance at the CAC's April meeting. We have
questions that we're seeking answers for and if you feel unfairly
treated by our increased attention to the commission that hasn't been
our intention.
As
far as the commission offering to post a regular column of sorts in
The Chetek Alert
or at a social media site that might be a good thing to better
educate all of us of the challenges of your industry that most of us
are not aware of. But the bottom line for every elected official,
every member of the commission included, is to be able to assure
those who put us in those places of authority – the taxpayers –
are getting the very best service that our tax dollars can afford.
You state subsidies are going up, and you want to know why, but you fail to mention that the City of Chetek receives a large grant that pays 40-50% of this subsidy.
ReplyDeleteYou bring up Nov. 7th again. It takes only one call to put a service out for an hour. You call it a perfect storm, but a service getting a call and being away happens every day. Let it go; it didn't matter if Chetek was in service that day or not. The minute a call comes in, that ambulance is busy. Stop beating a dead horse.
Chetek is not a full-time service; you cannot expect them to be in service 100% of the time. If you expect them to be, the City and surrounding areas will have to pay much more to staff that. Even if they were, when two calls come in simultaneously, somebody is going to have to wait. That's how it works.