Besides the Democratic and Republican primary candidates, there are four individuals running for three school board positions (Carrie Tracyzk, Cheryl Razim, Janene Haselhuhn and John Banks), and a few others running unopposed for different positions: Barron County Supervisor District 3 (John Banks), Ward 2 Alderman (Earl Grover), Ward 4 Alderman (Thea Hemple) and myself for mayor. There are three questions on the ballot as well, two of which pertain to the Wisconsin State constitution, and the other pertains to what the city council is requesting of its citizenry: to exceed the state levy by $350,000 annually for the purpose of hiring more police officers, public works staff and support staff.
Officially, it reads like this:
Vote for one
"Under State law, the increase in the levy of the City of Chetek for the tax to be imposed for the next fiscal year, 2024, is limited to 2.135%, which results in a levy of $1,350,665. Shall the City of Chetek be allowed to exceed this limit and increase the levy for the next fiscal year, 2024, for the purpose of enhancing Public Safety within the community through hiring and equipping more Police Officers, Public Works staff and support staff, by a total of 25.913%, which results in a levy of $1,700,665 and on an ongoing basis, include the increase of $350,000 for each fiscal year going forward?"
Yes or No
(From MyVote Wisconsin) |
If you choose to vote yes, it will allow the Chetek Police Department to continue to operate with five full-time officers AND hire an additional full-time officer. What's more it will allow Chetek Public Works Department to hire one additional staff member.
If you choose to vote no, in the short term it will mean that come fiscal year 2025 we will have to eliminate one full-time officer from our roster unless other solutions present themselves before then. It will also mean that Dan Knapp and crew will have to carry on as usual with the staff they currently have.
As
a city our desire is to maintain a 24/7 police department. That(Note: Chris Kroeze is not a member of
the Chetek PD)
is,
24 hours a day, 7 days a week at least one Chetek PD officer is
active and on patrol within the city. It
used to be that our roster could be filled out with a compliment of
both full and part-time officers. Due to the change in the national
culture, however, part-time police officers are rare and hard to come
by. Not as many cadets are in the academy these days and many times
by the time they get there they are already claimed by other
departments. If
this referendum fails it will mean that there will be times when
Chetek PD will be out of service. Of
course, we're grateful that during those times we can count on the
County for coverage – but only in emergencies. As it has been
explained to me by Sheriff Fitzgerald, in any given shift there are 5
deputies on duty throughout the county (providing no one is out ill
or on vacation). While I'm not threatening “longer response times”
I think it is fair to say a rejection of this question will mean
diminished services.
The base of the new water tower (courtesy of Mark Peterson) |
Our city is currently going through some growth pains. We are past the half-way mark on the Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) which is supposed to be complete and on-line by November of this year. What's more, any day now we can expect the crew that will be constructing our new water tower to return and finish the work they began last fall. They, too, promise to be done later this year. We have a signed agreement with SC Swiderski to develop the 39 acres on the west end of town upon completion of the water tower. Once its up and operational they promise to break ground. And according to our agreement, once they break ground they promise to complete the entire project (116 units of single family, twin homes and apartments) within two years! Potentially we could have as many as 500 people moving to town in the next couple of years. Even if Dan Knapp can't tell us yet if the new WWTP will require more man-hours than our current one requires to operate, more people will mean more garbage and demand for more services.
Again, if the question is rejected, Dan and his crew will continue to carry on the best they can but they're only human and can only be so many places at once. We may – and I stress “may” as I don't have access to a crystal ball even if I had the desire to use it – have to accept diminished services. Time will tell.
Earlier this month the council
sent out an informational flyer to allThe flyer that was sent out to
Chetek citizens
city residents that either
receive a water bill or garbage services. If you are a renter, you
may not have received this as it went to your landlord. You may want
to call him or her for a copy of that flyer or feel free to stop in
at City Hall this week and pick one up for yourself. We have also
hosted four listening sessions at The Center all of which have been
very sparsely attended. Either that means the flyer explains the
matter perfectly or people have already made up their mind one way or
another how they're going to vote. We'll all know soon enough.
Asking for more money for taxes is never a popular campaign slogan. I know the members of the council well enough to know that if another way could have been found without having to go this route they would have found it. A few of them are retired and are not overly excited of opening up that envelope come December and finding a higher tax bill. But as we see it we feel its the best option presently available to us that will guarantee that the city continues to function in a safe, healthy and responsible way.
Thank you for your consideration in the matter. My wife and I have lived in Chetek for over 32 years and have always found this community generous at heart and thoughtful in its decision making processes. I trust you will do what you think best come April 2.
No comments:
Post a Comment