Monday, June 15, 2026

To the best of my knowledge (a response to my recent post about flock cameras)

 

Flock cameras

Since my post last week about (mostly) the installation of flock cameras on Second Street (Kwik Trip) and Dallas Street (Dunamis) there has been some chatter of who authorized their installation and how they are funded. So to the best of my knowledge I can tell you this:


Whose decision was it to erect these cameras?

Chief Ambrozaitus. This was not a council decision. I only found out about these devices after they were set up. In fact, call me sheltered, but I had to do a little google search to find out what exactly a flock camera was simply to answer the question.


Where did the funding for them come from?

Chetek Police Department. Every fall CPD submits a budget request to the City Administrator. In tandem with the Budget Committee that budget, along with the other department's requests, the new year's budget is prepared and presented for full council approval in November. Chief Ambrozaitus did not approach the council for more spending authority than he is allowed so I assume that he decided that these were tools he needed and therefore purchased them out of his current operating budget.


Should he have informed the mayor and the rest of the council that he was considering installing them prior to their purchase?

It's true that the mayor is the technical head of the Police Department. Chief Ambrozaitus and I frequently discuss police matters so that I am reasonably kept in the loop. Having said that, I don't make it my business to tell Chief how to run his department. Given that this kind of technology is the issue of much debate these days should he have let me or the rest of the council know he was considering such a purchase is really a matter of perspective.


After serving alongside Chief for over ten years now I know it is his desire to keep the public safe and ensure our welfare. Some small towns are known for police chiefs who keep unspoken – and illegal – quotas on how many tickets he or she expects their officers to write each month. Chief Ron is not one of them. So as he shared at the June 9 council meeting he sees these cameras as a great tool to help keep our citizens safe. Besides, when several other municipalities in Barron County are already using them and their respective chiefs reporting to Chief how they have assisted them in their work he had good reasons to add them to our tool box.


The debate is real and reasonable

Honestly, prior to last Monday, I did not comprehend what a “hot button” item they are these days.

Google ALPRs (Automated License Plate Readers) and you are sure to find pros and cons to their use:

  • Thumb's Up:

    • They help police locate stolen vehicles and identify suspects

    • They assist with real-time alerts like Amber or Gray

  • Thumb's Down:

    • Privacy advocates argue that an untraceable, nationwide tracking system has been created that monitors everyday citizens without a warrant

    • Concern that law enforcement agencies will weaponize to track people engaging in peaceful protests

    • There strain on the annual police budget. It's one thing to buy the thing but then there's the annual cost of maintaining the services. (I don't know how much each camera cost but Chief did not approach council last year or any time this year for more money so it must have fallen within his current budget's operating expenses).


I suspect that none of these answers are going to be good enough for those who oppose their use. But some people asked and here are my answers offered in good faith. When Chief Ron says he's not “hunting” anyone I believe him and stand with him.


City Beach


Now about the beach. As summer is here and Liberty Fest quickly approaches I am hearing from a number of folks who are anxious to know when the beach project is going to get done. Last Fall a new lift station was put in at the beach (a lift station is a wastewater pumping system that moves sewage or stormwater from a lower elevation to a higher elevation. It is used when natural gravity flow is not possible, such as in flat terrain or for buildings situated below the main municipal sewer line; there are several around town). It was the final piece of our new Waste Water Treatment Plant. That is not work we do ourselves. Rather, we bid it out and therefore are at the mercy of contractor's schedule not our own. 


What's the hold up?

Winona Mechanical, the contractor, is waiting for Monarch Paving to complete the blacktop. After the blacktop is put down, Winona will finish grading and seeding the remaining area. That fencing there is not ours and there is legitimate concern of removing a contractor's fence without their permission. Public Works Director Justin Hutzler agrees with the rest of us that the beach area looks bad and should have been done a while ago. In his estimation, the remaining work will take roughly two days to complete. So like it or not we are presently in a “hurry-up-and-wait” posture for the time being keeping our fingers crossed that they'll get it done before Liberty Fest is upon us.


My guess there's more than a few of you that won't be happy with that answer but it's the best I can do for the time being. You can always reach me at my email chetekmayor@cityofchetekwi.us or at cell number 715-925-6078 (which is printed on my business card). Thank you for your concern about the town we all love. I do appreciate hearing from you even if you disagree with the opinions I express.



Wednesday, June 10, 2026

What's come to roost on Second and Dallas Streets?

 Funny you should ask...

It's that black pole in the middle


The other day someone reached out to me on social media to ask what the new funny poles were outside of Dunamis and Kwik Trip. Apparently there had been some chatter about them on Facebook and this person simply wanted to know whose they were. A simple text to Chief Ambrozaitus later I discovered that for the uninformed they are Flock cameras and these two are ours.


What's a Flock camera?

If you google the phrase you should find this:

Flock cameras are specialized, fixed-pole Automatic License Plate Readers (ALPRs) manufactured by Flock Safety. They are widely used by local law enforcement, private businesses, and neighborhood associations to capture high-resolution still images of passing vehicles and identify them based on license plates, make, model, color, and unique features like roof racks or bumper stickers.


I asked Chief to make a short presentation at June's council meeting and in case you missed it using himself, it captured a beautiful clear image of Chief driving his convertible into town to attend the council meeting.


Here's how they work:


  • Data capture: While they do not record continuous video or recognize faces. Instead, they snap still images of a vehicle's rear end as it passes in plain view.

  • AI Machine Learning: The software analyzes the image to create a "Vehicle Fingerprint," noting specific attributes such as missing plates, after-market wheels, or visible damage.

  • Real-Time Alerts: They compare captured plates against “hot lists” (such as AMBER or GRAY alerts or local stolen vehicle databases and ping law enforcement instantly if a match is found.


Of course, what most people want to know is will they be receiving a speeding ticket in the mail should they exceed the posted speed limit at either end of town? Chief assured us that is not what a flock camera is for. Rather, it's another tool on their tool belt to help ensure the public's safety.


In case you were wondering, the County already has 10 of their own (as well as a portable one) as do the Cities of Rice Lake (13), Barron (3), Cumberland (3) and Turtle Lake (2). Word is Cameron is considering purchasing one or two for their department as well. “I can assure the citizens of Chetek that I'm not watching you,” said Chief at the meeting. “But if it can help us solve a crime, we're going to use it.”


They sure look like fun


In an unrelated matter you may have noticed the announcement that Chetek PD posted at their Facebook page regarding banning the use of golf carts and electric scooters/skate boards inside the city limits. While the PD is more concerned about their use on county roads (e.g., Dallas Street, Second Street, Sumner Ave [i.e., the long bridge], County Road D (East and West) and Country Road M), at present there are no Wisconsin state statutes that make golf carts and scooters legal for standard roadway use.


These things can motor
If you've seen kids zipping around on these electric scooters, they sure look like they're having a ball, don't they? But you put an elementary kid no more than 3 or 4 feet tall on one of those without a helmet going as high as 20 mph who may not be fully aware of the rules of the road and you may have a formula for trouble or injury. Mind you, we're not talking about electric bikes. That's different. They got zip to them too but are considered street-legal.


And what's so bad about golf carts? Simple: they were not created to be road vehicles. They're meant for golf courses and retirement communities. And while we have our fair-share of old people around La Boca Vista we are not.


It may be a Florida-thing but not here


It's not the PD's desire to be the great kill-joy of every kid's summer days. But they do have the responsibility of keeping us safe and reminding us, when needed, of the rules of the road. With everyone's cooperation they won't have to.


To read the full press release go to the Chetek Police Department's Facebook page or see the front page of this week's Chetek Alert.